Showing posts with label Articel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Articel. Show all posts

Saturday, 20 August 2016

? Is the law on responsibility Diminished Satisfactory

? Is the law on responsibility Diminished Satisfactory -

Voluntary manslaughter, as established in the Homicide Act 1957 is determined by three sections: diminished responsibility, provocation and suicide pact. These are all known meaning as part of defense that they do not give full acquittal of a sentence only, that the murder of homicide shorten. Diminished responsibility of § 2 of the Homicide Act is determined, stating that "If a person kills or party to a killing of another, he will not be convicted of murder if he affected by such abnormality of mind as much his mental responsibility suffered for his acts and omissions in doing or as a party to the killing. "

There can be used as a defense to murder if the defendant can prove an abnormality of mind when, for example, is the defendant an alcoholic, or has a mental condition as in Byrne (1960), in which the defendant had uncontrollable sexual desires. The defense is that the defendant does not have the necessary control over their actions when a reasonable person compared. Diminished responsibility has been criticized for a number of reasons, the very term "Diminished Responsibility" was criticized by authorities such as the Butler Committee, saying it was "not a medical fact the defendant in the context". There are also many other areas, which makes this area of ​​law controversial as I will discuss.

abnormality of mind covers a wide range of situations and described by Lord Cj Parker in the Court of Appeal in the case of Byrne (1960) as "a state of mind so different from the ordinary people, that the reasonable People would call abnormal. " In Byrne (1960), who was strangled and then mutilated a young woman accused of a sexual psychopath. He was convicted of murder, but the Court of Appeal considers that his condition came in the definition of diminished responsibility and he is convinced the murder was substituted for a murder.

The main problem was that the medical experts had describes Byrnes state as amounting to "partial insanity" and the appeal court had approved it. But in Seers (1984) has found that comparisons with madness are unhelpful and should be avoided. In this case, the defendant stabbed his estranged wife, claiming diminished responsibility because of chronic reactive depression. The judge directed that needed to be successful for the defense borders be Seers on the insane. It was his as his conviction of murder for a murder replaced was found to limit the insane as a result.

Another problem is with the Law on the diminished responsibility that diminished responsibility a wide range of mental conditions covers such as paranoia and epilepsy. Some conditions have been known for years, but some of the conditions that have been recognized in recent years as "battered woman syndrome", was shown in the case of Hobson (1998). In this case, the defendant stabbed her alcoholic and abusive partner to death in 1992 during an argument. At the hearing they claimed that they had acted in self-defense, and there was a subsidiary issue on provocation. Diminished responsibility was not specifically raised, and the accused was found guilty. She called based on the grounds of diminished responsibility on battered woman syndrome, which has not been viewed as an anomaly of the spirit to 1994. The Court of Appeal upheld the appeal and ordered a retrial. The problem with this area of ​​law is that some conditions can not be regarded as an anomaly when the mind only later and so the development in this area of ​​law is very slow, resulting in the people who have a real condition that they had no control for to be punished about

, the abnormality of the mind through one of the questions that needs to be created in the parentheses in § 2 (1) of the Homicide Act 1957. These are: a state arrested or retarded development of mind. any inherent cause of an illness or injury induced. Inherent cause means towards one that comes from the interior of the defendant, as to an external factor, and it does not have to be permanent. The important point is that it must be given at the trial medical evidence, an abnormality of the mind of one of the specified causes.The abnormality of mind must be, arise affecting the responsibility for his actions substantially the defendant. In Lloyd (1967) it was found that means "essential" not "total", nor did it "trivial" or "minimal". There is something in between, and it is to decide to jury whether the mental responsibility of the accused was impaired and, if so, it was substantially affected? In seers (1984), the court as well as the phrase "serious," and decided that "substantially" means more than "trivial", but not "total" or "absolute" impaired.

Diminished responsibility and alcohol makes things more complicated, as there are various combinations of noise and diminished responsibility that must be taken into account, which are: noise only, noise and a pre-existing abnormality of mind is not connected to the noise, noise, damage and noise the brain caused due to the dependence / addiction.There is a clear rule that alone is not abated intoxication responsibility. In Di Duca (1959) - chosen The Court of Appeal that the immediate effects of alcohol or drugs to take, were not a violation, even if it did have an effect on the brain. So a "temporary" state of intoxication was no abnormality of mind.

There are also difficulties also in cases in which the accused has an abnormality of mind, but also, at the time he intoxicated killing does. This issue was considered in Gittens (1984). In this case, the accused is suffering from depression. On a visit home from the hospital, he argued with his wife and beaten to death and then raped and killed his stepdaughter. At the time of the offense he had been drinking and taking drugs for depression. The jury had to consider all the factors, the noise of the exclusion and see if it was responsible for his actions to a significant deterioration of the defendant. The decision was interpreted as meaning that the defendant could make only diminished responsibility to prove if he could satisfy the jury that he had killed because of abnormality of mind, even if he had been intoxicated.

This point was later confirmed by Dietsch Man (2003). In this case, the defendant killed a man in a brutal attack while he was very drunk. He was also suffering from a mental abnormality, namely an adjustment disorder was a depressive grief reaction after the death of his aunt, Sarah, with whom he had a close emotional and physical relationship and he had believed (wrongly) committed suicide because of their drug problems. It was found that to benefit from the knowledge of the diminished responsibility, D he would not have to show who killed he had been sober. Also by intoxicated it will not not entitle the accused to the benefit of the defense of diminished responsibility, is the only factor than capable recognizes the law his spiritual responsibility of diminishing the spiritual described by the experts anomaly. It was also said that drink totaling Diminished responsibility is only able if either damage to the brain caused or generated an irresistible desire, so that the consumption involuntarily (eg alcohol dependence syndrome)

If the brain has been violated by alcoholism, this injury or illness can support a finding of diminished responsibility. This was stated in Tandy (1989). In Tandy (1989), the defendant, an alcoholic, almost a bottle of vodka had been drinking when she told her mother that she (Tandy) was involved 11 years old daughter with her husband. They strangled her 11 years old daughter. (They usually drank vermouth or barley wine), the Appellate Court found that, if the defendant is not able to resist drinking, so that is involuntary, this amounted to a diminished responsibility. The same point was again as in Wood (2008), in which the Court of Appeal pointed out that the "sharp effect of the distinction made in Tandy distinction between cases where brain damage as a result of alcohol dependence syndrome has occurred and where it is not, no longer appropriate. the court of appeal also said that the jury should ignore any consumption of alcohol which they voluntarily decide. in the case of Wood (2008), the accused was drunk and went into the victim's house and fell asleep. When he awoke the victim found trying oral sex on him to perform and hit the victim with a meat clever to kill him.

Although diminished responsibility had provided a satisfactory defense madness for the defendants available to the killing, but suffer from a mental abnormality, there is the defense still has problems. One such problem is the burden of proof, as in most other cases, the defense has to collect only the defense, and it is up to the prosecution to disapprove it. Nothing accused pleasing diminished responsibility are at a disadvantage, which is not confronted by this increase provocation.

Another problem is the wording of § 2 of the Homicide Act 1957. The definition in this has constantly criticized. Lord Justice Buxton describes the formulation as a "disgrace". The Law Commission in its report, murder, manslaughter and infanticide (2006) pointed out two fundamental problems with the law. These were that the section does not explain what is involved "substantially impaired mental responsibility" and that the definition in section 2 was not written with the needs and practices of medical experts in mind.

There have also been many proposals for reform. For example, recommended placement of the Butler Committee, the burden of proving that the accused did the act (or omission made) with the requisite state of mind, in pursuit. The logic behind the proposal of the Committee seems to have the perceived anomaly of the burden of proof with respect to the defense of insanity and diminished responsibility. The Criminal Law Revision Committee also felt that the prosecution should bear the burden of disproving insanity and diminished responsibility. They felt that but happy lawyers with the difference may be between to be safe, and be satisfied on the balance of probabilities (adding "if indeed any are"), jurors are probably confused by these subtleties and by the different placing the burden of proof for different offenses. The Criminal Law Revision Committee their confidence in the judge, to ensure that defenses which have no proper basis for the evidence to be withdrawn from the jury.

also the Butler Committee recommended that it should be possible, where the prosecution is in the proof possession indicates that a defense under the section can be made for them to raise manslaughter in the first instance and not as murder , The Committee determined that the prosecution would likely only to take this course if it is clear that the defense to it were pleasant. If the defense wanted should resist evidence of mental disorder, the charge to be murder, as is currently the case.

The criminal law have approved the recommendation of the Audit Committee Butler Committee, the opinion is that the mental state of a disturbed person is not likely, by improving a murder charge outstanding. They felt also that it can not be right that the charges in the most solemn manner known to the law should be given priority, that is to prosecution if the prosecutor that it is a defense to the charge, which is suitable to to be succesfull. Here the criminal law revision committee had the support of several prominent public institutions.

This recommendation, however, is not adopted in the Bill. Sparing notified the defendant of the fear of a process of murder and to appear of the fear on a murder charge in court would have given expression to the founding of mankind, to which the defense is based. Only cases where the medical evidence the prosecution would have denied would be tried as murder. So valuable court would have saved time and money, as a judge not with lengthy medical testimony on the issue of diminished responsibility before deciding whether or not to accept the request or leave it for jury determination are confronted. This leads me to the conclusion that yes, the law on diminished responsibility is satisfactory indeed.

As a 7 in your IB Economics IA Get

As a 7 in your IB Economics IA Get -

As an economy IA posting comment

comments of the internal assessment component of the IB Economics course form. This component is worth 20% of the final score, but the flexibility and time you are available, there should be no reason why you can not score a high mark in this field.

is write the best part of the comment that you can decide to write the concepts. You decide to choose which products. You also are relatively no time pressure, which gives you plenty of opportunity to revise your comment and refine

This article aims to guide you through :.

路 As an economy to choose products

路 a systematic method to write a comment

路 a reference to definitions

路 Key points to remember

choosing a good article

in one sentence, this is the best advice I've heard about economy comments:

"a good comment not aimed economy in economy "

What does this mean

It means that the item you should primarily" non-economic ", ie uses its select everyday language. However, there should be a way for you, your business apply knowledge to the article

Against this background, if you find the following guidelines your item .:

1. Do not select products Pounds have written

Article by economists existing analysis

, or products that have a significant amount of analysis of the subject already, are often not good comment pieces. This is because too much would have been done by the review for you, and you are just the items with little input to be reformulated. It is better to find articles from the Daily News reporter who have little economic input and analysis.

2. Article must have something that you can evaluate

The best products are those where there is some controversy, for example:

路 If a tax on these be well placed

路 If the monopoly be regulated?

路 Should the government impose a tariff?

路 Is raising rates a good idea?

路 is this country's economic growth unstable?

whatever discussed the article you must be able to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of something and weigh. As such, often describe political decisions products are good to for writing comments.

It is therefore not recommended to choose products that list a few statistics about something that has happened to the economy.

. 3 As a focus for your evaluation have

750 words is not enough to effectively evaluate multiple situations and policy decisions. Ideally, choose a product that reflects this - that is, only describes a situation / policy. If this is not possible, then select the relevant part of the article, you will be discussing.

4. Select Search your concept before for the product

Think about the concepts in the area of ​​the curriculum that you are most confident about the vote. What this means is that you can be sure to list and explain at least 3 advantages and disadvantages of the policy / situation and illustrate this with diagrams

Good topics that assessment could be rich.

Microeconomics

路 implementation of price floors and ceilings

路 taxes (Australian carbon tax is good)

路 Externalities

路 buffer stock schemes

路 regulation of monopolies and oligopolies

路 subsidies

Macroeconomics:

路 The monetary policy decisions

路 financial policy decisions

路 economic growth implications

international Economics: to implement

路 decision protectionism (often fares)

路 decisions to influence the exchange rate

development economics:

路 Help receiving

路 growth development

see the article:

Once you have decided on your topic, you can find product should be fairly easy. Just search Google for related articles on this subject. You can add a bit of trial and error have. If you get stuck, try this approach:

Land + subject

For example, Russia fare price China ceiling, Australia carbon tax

Google now has a search function for news articles ,

If possible, have some variety in terms of the countries that you are discussing, so do not talk about China for all your products.

A systematic fashion to the article to write

This approach will work for the vast majority of products can be found. Note that this is similar to the approach described in "How to get the perfect score in an IB Economics Essay."

1. Grasp the important aspect of the article in 1-2 sets (preferably 1)

Assume that the moderator has already read your article, you have to explain not spend long, what the article is. With only 750 words are available, every word must count. So keep this part as short as possible.

The main purpose of this sentence is to let them know the examiner to be which part of the article, to keep the most important.

2. Show evaluate your intent and what it is that you will evaluate

leave no doubt in the mind of the auditor, from the beginning, you intend to vote. Comments that are purely descriptive with little evaluation, should and will help to avoid to prevent that to go in this case.

This should be only 1 to 2 sets.

3. List and explain advantages

The more detailed explanation of the benefit, the less benefits you must discuss and vice versa. Aim for at least 2 and not more than 3, although in rare cases, have only one advantage that you discuss in length.

discussed

With practice, you will work intuitively, like the length and detail that any benefit must in. Ideally, one plot per advantage discussed.

as you advanced will write in your essay, it is often useful to also qualify these benefits. Rather than simply "is a significant advantage that the policy will reduce unemployment," write writes "Since the economy is likely to be experiencing a deflationary gap, a major advantage of the policy that it will help to bring the economy closer to full employment."

4. list and explain disadvantages

the principles behind it are the same as for the benefits.

5. Weigh the advantages and disadvantages

It is often the case that the advantages and disadvantages do not carry the same weight. Depending on what is evaluated and the economy under consideration is, it is often more sensible one side or another to reject, rather than simply write: "It depends."

This is your conclusion substantially. should be for the vast majority of evaluations, and a preliminary conclusion, that "it is likely to be advantageous overall" rather than "It is definitely an advantage, as a whole."

for evaluations of policy it can be powerful to examine here some alternative policy options. Remember that to do nothing is a potential political decision.

are awarded A note on definitions

Marks for the correct definitions and as such it is important that you define the main economic words in your comment. However, to limit with a small word, arise definitions opportunity cost, the next best alternative waived if an economic decision.

must be as such a decision is made about which conditions you define. Keep the following in mind when deciding how and what to define.

1. Definitions should be as smooth as possible

For example, integrated, if you were to define maximum price:

Do not write:

The Chinese government a maximum price imposed on pork. A ceiling price is the maximum price set that can be levied on a product or service

Instead write .:

The Chinese government has a maximum price imposed the maximum price that can be charged to a commodity or service on pork.

The second approach saves words and flows better.

necessarily define 2. Not every single Economic word in your essay.

you just do not have enough words to define everything. Not all economic concepts are crucial for your review. If you are often there are defined words such as supply, demand, price or the amount you define too much.

is for the most part, do not show your understanding of the economic concept, with a libretto quoting definition, but by placing them correctly in your analysis.

to get an idea of ​​what needs to be defined, have some questions data response and look at what is defined in part a).

do not let your comment suffer death by definition.

3. Avoid

footnotes contained in your word limit footnotes with

, and it is often cost more words to write a definition in full, to smoothly in contrast to integrate in your comment. to remember

Key Points

1. Your comment purpose should be to evaluate. The review should be the "extra" part that you add, not be on for bonus marks.

2. Your analysis must

imagine your article specifically Basically when I took your comment and turned your item for another article on the same topic. If your item still "works", then your item is not targeted.

Be careful when generic arguments as the use of "A recession is a decline in demand for the product mean". If the product alcohol or cigarette, this is unlikely to be the case.

In addition, when you say: "The monopoly should be regulated by the government", make sure that the monopoly is not already regulated. Similarly, if you suggesting that the government have lower interest rates and the interest rates at zero for near (eg Japan), then your argument is flawed.

diagrams Draw the economic situation into account. when the economy in your article For example, is currently in a recession, dragging your AD / AS diagram. a deflationary gap Not AD SAS have cut production to full employment level. If your products in the industry is a net exporter, drawing the world market price is above the equilibrium domestic price.

Close thoughts

The internal assessment component should be the simplest component, high marks to score on. You have the flexibility of time, and you get basically your own testing to select question.

Hopefully this guide will give you the necessary direction and achieve your goals IB Economics.

Good Luck

Owen Yang

Executive Tutor - Australian IB studies

founder - IB Blueprint

Thursday, 18 August 2016

Politik und Governance Politrics von

Politik und Governance Politrics von -

Wie die Hirten kümmern sich um ihre Schafe, Tierfutter und schützen sie, so dass wir Menschen, als eine Nation, Notwendigkeit ein Führer, der sich um uns kümmern können, bietet die Ressourcen der Nation und ein Umfeld, in dem wir in Frieden und genießen unser leben leben können. Ich bekomme immer noch aufgeregt, wenn ich das Leiden einer Nation für seine bösen Führer hören und es interessiert mich zu diesem Thema zu schreiben.

Politik ist ein sehr weit gefasster Begriff und besteht aus der Kunst oder der Wissenschaft der Regierung oder der Verwaltung, insbesondere die Verwaltung einer politischen Einheit, als eine Nation, und die Verwaltung und die Kontrolle über seine inneren und äußeren Angelegenheiten. Allerdings scheint die Politik nun der Akt des Diktieren für andere zu sein, mit anderen Worten, der Akt seiner eigenen Gedanken zur Einführung und denken über andere, nicht eingehalten, was versprochen worden war und betrügen und um unschuldige Bürger zu täuschen. Auf der anderen Seite, Politrics durch die Aktivitäten von Politikern, die die Öffentlichkeit irreführen zu denken, sie kümmern sich um sie und für sie verantwortlich sein. Dazu gehören, wie diese "Diebe" in ihren Kampagnen und wenn sie an der Macht sind. Aktionen und Werke dieser "Diebe" scheinen das Gegenteil von dem zu sein, was sie versprechen, für die Bürger, bevor sie an die Macht kamen. Wenn eine Person oder eine Gruppe von Personen ist / sind in der Lage, diese Effekte auf den Einzelnen oder der Gesellschaft zu erzeugen, wird die politische Macht erhalten. Diese Leistung kann durch Wahlen erreicht werden.

Wenn eine Fraktion an der Macht durch Wahlen sein will, leugnen sie die Versprechungen, die leicht fangen die unschuldige Menschen zum Opfer fallen. Die Kampagnenbotschaften dieser Menschen klingen wie eine Melodie, die Aufmerksamkeit leicht anzieht und in der Lage, Menschen zu täuschen sie auf dem so genannten "Sitz des Reichtums" zu stimmen montieren. Wenn sie auf diesem Sitz sind, scheinen Umweltbedingungen um ihre Chancen zu erhöhen, vergessen zu werden; was machen sie vergessen, die Versprechen, die sie gemacht. Ray Davies in seinem Lied Geld und Korruption sagte, dass "Geld und Korruption ruinieren das Land, krumm Politiker verraten die arbeitenden Menschen, die Gewinne Gefühl und behandeln uns wie Schafe und wir müde von Lern ​​Versprechen sind wir wissen, dass sie nie halten "(1973). wegen Geld und Reichtum, diese Politiker nutzen die" Wege und Mittel "durch Kampagnen erhalten Macht und sich weigern, über die Menschen zu denken und was sie versprachen. Es ist keine Überraschung "gebrochenen Versprechen" sind Begriffe, mit denen jetzt täglich von Journalisten und Meinungsumfragen diese Versprechen zu beschreiben.

Es gibt in der Welt mehrere Fälle von gebrochenen Versprechen gewesen, zur Kenntnis genommen und unnoted noch. Sie werden mir zustimmen, wenn Sie Kenntnis von den Kampagnenbotschaften nahm Ihres Präsidenten in den letzten Jahren und die Verwirklichung dieser Versprechungen. Ich möchte Sie in der Vergangenheit zu denken und dieses Problem in Ihrem politischen System und Führung bemerken, mit den wenigen zu vergleichen Ich werde sprechen und Sie vielleicht nicht viele Unterschiede finden.

Im Jahr 2000 amerikanische Präsidentenwahl, George W. Bush, dann ein Wahlkandidat sagt "Der Kongress wird Push und schieben ... und ich sage meine Lippen lesen: keine neuen Steuern" Wie süß diese Nachricht klingelt. ! und es war genug, um ihn an die Macht zu schieben, aber er war nicht in der Lage, dieses Versprechen zu halten und ausgeglichenen Haushalt verlassen, als er an die Macht gewählt wurde. Während der 2003 provinzielle Wahl in Ontario, Kanada, hat die Liberale Partei zu schneiden versprochen aber die Steuern erhöht Steuern, nachdem er an die Macht kam.

Diese politricks scheinen eine genetische Krankheit, die von einem Präsidenten zum anderen mit Hilfe von Umweltfaktoren wie Gier geführt wird, Untreue, Sie nennen können, auch wenn sie nicht biologisch verwandt werden kann, ist es nicht ungewöhnlich, heute im Internet zu finden, hören die Medien und andere Quellen Mehrere Versprechungen "Obama gebrochenen Versprechen" .. er ist immer noch unzufrieden. Dies sind nur einige Beispiele, und ich wette, Sie haben mehrere Fälle hatten wir in unseren verschiedenen lokalen Gemeinschaften, entweder bemerkt oder ignoriert. Nicht nur sind diese Führer ihre Versprechen brechen, sondern auch die Vorteile ihrer Positionen zu nehmen staatliches Eigentum zu plündern. Dies macht die Politik ein Spiel.

Politik wie ein Spiel Projekt, das von Politikern und unschuldige Bürger besteht, die nicht viel in die Türme vertieft haben das Spiel zu spielen. Die Politik, das Land verwenden als Beratungsprojekt und ihre Gegner zu täuschen, zu tun, die Menschen in dem Land, etwas dummes, so dass sie genießen können und alle Teile des Spiels greifen für die Gewinner zu tun. Politiker spielen auf den Köpfen unschuldiger Bürger und berauben sie von dem, was die "nationale Kuchen" genannt wird und es als eine persönliche Reichtum nehmen. Diese Gier führte zu vielen Krisen in der Welt, wo einige Länder Wirtschaftskrisen konfrontiert sind, aber ihre Führer sind Tonnen von Reichtum. Dies ist nicht die Phantasie des großen Mannes versteckt, Abraham Lincoln, der in einem seiner Zitate, sagte: "Ich sehe in naher Zukunft Annäherung an eine Krise, die verunsichert und mich für die Sicherheit meines Landes zittern" (1864) . Abraham Lincoln war richtig, weil, wenn ich daran denke, wie unsere Führer plündern die staatlichen Eigentum und "den gemeinen Mann" kämpfen täglich Brot zu finden, die mich zum Weinen. Unsere Länder in Schwierigkeiten sind unter jenen Führern, die von dem Wohlergehen der Menschen nicht denken, sondern ihre eigenen "Taschen.« ich deutete unten aus, einige Beispiele.

in einem Beitrag auf Nigeria Site-Richtlinien Emmanuel Aziken auf den Verteidigungshaushalt für das Jahr 2009 in Nigeria, wurde gezeigt, dass der Außenminister der damaligen Zeit, Chef Ojo Madoekwe im Rahmen ihrer internationalen Reise N2.7 Milliarden verbrachte im Jahr 2009 Vorsitzender des Senatsausschusses für auswärtige Angelegenheiten, Jibril Aminu, der die Sitzung des Verteidigungshaushalts unter dem Vorsitz der N2.7 Milliarden beschreibt durch den Minister als "eine wirtschaftliche Verschwendung." (Nigeria Politik, 2009). die interessante Tatsache über diese Probleme ausgegeben ist, dass diese Politiker nicht manchmal nicht in der Lage Details zu geben, wie diese Mittel wurden, wenn die Nachfrage Rechenschaftspflicht ausgegeben. Dieses Geld durch Umwandlung und die Ressourcen des Landes ist eine riesige Menge von einem Minister nur auf Reisen übergeben werden. Ich fange an zu fragen, wie der Minister dann plündern, wenn andere Bereiche wie Ölsektor in seiner Aufgaben hinzugefügt werden ?. Zweifellos wäre es Milliarden von Geld aus den Ressourcen des Staates zu machen, während die Lebensbedingungen der Bürger sind nicht die besten.

Ein weiteres trauriges Ereignis passiert in meinem Land, in Ghana 2009 Afrikanische Heimat CHAN (Nations Cup) Finale zwischen Ghana und Benin in Abidjan, Côte d'Voire. Es gab Vorwürfe gegen den Minister für Jugend und Sport, Hon. Muntaka Muhammed Missbrauch von Geld und Korruption im Land. Untersuchungen durch die nationale Sicherheit gegen den Fall gegen den Minister, der Präsidentensprecher unterzeichnet, zeigte Mahama Ayariga, dass der Minister als Erstattung 15.200,00 GHC für Fleisch und Lebensmittel bezahlt wurde. (ILoveAfrica, blogspot). Ich denke, wenn das ganze Land auf dieser Reise gegangen wäre, hätten wir nicht das Geld ausgegeben haben, die sich um nur für eine letzte Reise Spiel $ 7.600,00 annähert.

Das erinnert mich an eine Geschichte, die ich in der jüngeren Alters gehört, dass es ein Mann war nach dem Essen nur durch das Verdauungssystem passieren essen, ohne verdaut zu werden und aus seinem Anus . Dieser Mann kann in der Welt essen, ohne zufrieden. Wenn der Minister es ausgeben konnte allein auf Nahrung, so denke ich, dass er von einer ähnlichen Krankheit leiden kann. Dies sind nur einige Beispiele; die Liste kann weiter und weiter, von Land zu Land gehen. Es ist Zeit, dass wir unseren Geist und Augen gefunden Lösung dieses Problems geöffnet.

Darüber hinaus hat die Regierung von Gordon Brown Island zu Wirtschaftskrisen in den Jahren 2008-2011 führte. Laut dem Guardian, "sagte Gordon Brown die Medien auf der ganzen Welt, dass Island praktisch bankrott war, was falsch war. Dann rief er den Anti-Terror-Gesetz (2001) alle isländischen Vermögen in Großbritannien einzufrieren." (Theguardian, 2009). Dies führte Business-Männer und Frauen in Island nicht in der Lage, ihr Vermögen in britischen Banken erholen, sie handelten mit. Der Bericht sagte auch, dass Präsident alle lokalen Regierungen im Land erfordert Konten und den Handel mit den Banken zu öffnen, die hohe Steuern erfordern führen die meisten Business-Männer und Frauen, in Konkurs zu gehen, während ihr Vermögen waren in Großbritannien einzufrieren. Ich denke, dass Präsident Gordon Brown absichtlich gewählt wurde darauf geachtet, des Landes und das Wohlergehen der Bürger zu nehmen. Aber wenn er diese Aufgabe nicht tun kann, erwartet die Bürger Unglück so zu erhöhen ?, Was haben sie getan, um diese Strafe zu verdienen?

leiden unschuldige Bürger in den Händen dieser "politricsters" und ich fühle mich für meine Bürger traurig. Gott uns von diesen Menschen zu retten. Denken Sie daran, dass ich sie nicht hassen, aber ich hasse ihre Charaktere. Wie lange diese Führer sollten weiterhin auf den Köpfen von uns zu spielen und unser geliebtes Land zu Krisen führen? Es ist Zeit, die wir zusammen waren, und machte weise Entscheidungen.

Ich würde sagen, dass die Entwicklung eines Landes und das Wohlergehen seiner Bürger auf diesen Führern so viel abhängen. Dies in einer Art und Weise bedeutet, dass, wenn wir nicht gute Führer haben, die Entwicklung eines Landes ernsthaft und das Land ist in der Krise behindert werden. Wir sollten uns alle engagieren und nicht nachlässig sein bei dem Versuch, diese Menschen "gewissenhaft" in unserer Governance zu beseitigen. Lassen Sie uns für das Land und nicht die Irre geführt werden durch die Worte "süß" die Verwendung "von politricians" klug sein, sondern versuchen, auf die Verdienste der einzelnen Kandidaten zu suchen und eine weise Entscheidung zu treffen, den besten Mann zu wählen, uns zu führen. Ich würde auch sagen, dass wir formale Mittel verwenden, um diese Führer verantwortlich und machen detaillierte Berichte über zu halten, wie sie verbringen und das Eigentum des Staates verwenden. Wenn wir das tun, denke ich, dass wir eine Gesellschaft zu schaffen, wo wir alle in Frieden leben, den Reichtum des Staates zu genießen und unser Land besser für diese Generation und die nächsten Generationen zu machen.

Why is it important to keep up with the news

Why is it important to keep up with the news -

Many people neglect the messages and do not know what in the world is around them on. This is a big mistake, however, and a good understanding of current business is actually crucial for many reasons. Here we see at just why it is so important to follow the news and why you are interested in a news blog, website or news channel, with regular updates.

First, the message sometimes you should look can influence. You might think not, that message is constantly crises in other countries, or things that have happened to other people, but rather the message reflects a policy or government decision that your tax dollars are used and this will affect your business. The government is working for us, and that is the true idea of ​​democracy, but it is the press and the blogs and news channels that allow us to actually see what the government do and allow to for democracy work. People fought and died for freedom of speech and freedom of the press, which comes with it, and so your back to return it a fatal error. When it comes to an election, the news of the last few years should be to influence your decision the main thing.

At the same time often the messages you can directly influence. the recent news of the ash cloud For example, should the overcast sky that many flights had to be canceled or could not continue. Those only who read a news blog or saw a news channel would not have known ahead to go and book all last minute flights. Even on a more basic level, the news often, the weather, and that will impact on whether we will get wet when we bring out or remember head an umbrella.

The message is also very important for the interview. If something big is happening in the news, this is a sure way to spark a conversation with someone where it might otherwise have been an awkward silence. At the same time in a group of people about the messages you do not want to speak the only one who does not know what as this going you can feel very isolated and out of touch. At the same time you can lose respect from the other people, who will appreciate the news and current affairs more.

Of course, the news is even and especially is interesting, as it will be a lot, you are not interested, as always there will be something, attracts the attention, and that on one of the fields that you find interesting Is related. If you like celebrities and gossip then this will always find its way on the news, while the mean time you will probably also find information about Sport and innovative science.

If you keep up-to-date with the news but fight to the time the new media technologies to find now permit many new methods quickly and specific messages means to receive updates, there really is no excuse left, not knowing what is going on in the world itself.

WELCOME TO MY WEBSITE